Working : Our Union

For my Equity brethren: This is about the non-AEA tour of Catch Me If You Can and touring in general.

Read it (and check out Nick's "Touring 101" and "Touring 102" if you haven't already.)

If you have problems with this - any of it - contact our union.

If you are on board with this - any of it - contact our union.


Write emails, make phone calls, send old fashioned letters. Contact Nick directly. Contact the business rep of your current or most recent contract. Contact friends you have on council, on the committees. And don't just call or write to cheer or boo. Yes cheer and, God knows, boo, but then have a conversation. Get some skin in the game. It's our union. That means it's our responsibilty. AEA is not our parents, it's us and people who work for us.

Blowing off steam to each other in the wings and on the web is the first thing we do in these situations, but please don't make it the last.

From the President:

Catchme-asaurus vs. Cashcow-asaurus...Or How Can Catch Me Go Non-Equity ?

By Nick Wyman
A well-known theater website just posted that (as announced by the Broadway producers last May) my most recent Broadway show CATCH ME IF YOU CAn will go out on a national tour this fall. Immediately, Facebook and my e-mail inbox burst into flame. How come? The tour is not going out on a full Production contract or a Tier. It isn't going out on SETA (Short Engagement Touring Agreement). It is going out non-Equity.

Most of the Facebook comments were quick to place the blame: it's that blasted union, letting decent-paying jobs slip through their careless fingers. It galls me that this wonderful piece of Broadway entertainment, this show that I have been so proud to be part of during its four-year development and all-too-short six-month Broadway run is going out non-Equity. It galls me just as much that my fellow union members think AEA is to blame.

As I laid out in my "Touring 101" and "Touring 102", touring is now a very difficult environment in which to make money -- whether you are a Producer, a presenter, or an Actor. Government funding has been slashed or eliminated, donors have pulled back and subscription lists have shrunk -- so the local presenters are refusing to pay the guarantees necessary to mount and run an Equity show, even on the lowest SETA category. If a Producer needs $280K to $300K per week to run his show and only three or four cities will guarantee more than $230K, the Producer (who may have already lost most of the investors' money during the Broadway run) will take the sure money -- exceedingly modest but sure -- of licensing the show rather than taking the risk of losing yet more of the investors' money.

As I explained, the union's approach has morphed from last century's "If you want professional actors, you have to pay full production salaries" (which I wholeheartedly supported then) to our current stance of "If you can prove you're getting low guarantees, we'll share the risk/reward with you by taking lower salaries in exchange for a back-end participation" (which I just as wholeheartedly support now). This change in strategy has enabled AEA to maintain and even increase our share of the touring market. As you may recall, our share of the one-week touring market had slipped to about 60% as recently as 2003. Currently, almost every show playing engagements of one week or longer is on an Equity contract.

AEA has a staff of hard-nosed, experienced, creative negotiators who work with (and sometimes against) Producers to cajole them into making the most favorable deal possible for the members. Sometimes, however, the two sides just can't make the numbers work.

If a show is a smash hit like WICKED or JERSEY BOYS, the money is there and it all works. (Check out my "Touring 102" column for a discussion of the numbers.) The producers of the Tony-winning Broadway hit BILLY ELLIOTT thought, not unreasonably, that they had a similarly rainmaking cash cow and sent out not one but two national tours on a full Production contract with an Equity company of more than four dozen and many trucks worth of scenery and costumes. To break even, they needed to make a ton of money. They didn't. The two tours were consolidated, and the four major sit-down cities were divvied up. One tour closed in Canada; and the other tour, faced with upcoming shorter engagements (and consequently many more expensive moves), planned to close and license the tour to a non-Equity producer. Our staff was able to convince the producer to reconsider their decision to go non-Equity, in part through a mutual careful review of the financial and human elements of the new production, and thus keep it on an Equity contract, albeit a SETA as opposed to full Production.

For saving the resulting Equity jobs -- more jobs than the average touring show and jobs paying far more than the average Equity job -- the union received nothing but grief for having "allowed" the B.E. producers to reduce the actors' salaries This goes to the heart of my beef with member complaints about AEA's strategy with road shows: AEA doesn't allow producers to reduce member salaries, AEA allows producers not to eliminate member jobs. Would you rather have 80 jobs at $2000 a week or 400 jobs at $1000 a week?

We all -- Actors, directors, designers, Producers, presenters -- want touring shows to be duplicates of the Broadway show: a thrilling and moving entertainment with a spectacular set, extravagant costumes, a huge orchestra and a top-notch cast. On the road, however, costs soar because the set has to be disassembled, transported and reassembled (sometimes once a week) and the cast and those orchestra and crew members traveling with the show have to be paid per diem for their housing and meals. Those are the two big cost-factors on the road: the size of the touring complement and the number of trucks.

Many of our Production Contract bargaining partners, used to the more expansive and forgiving environment of Broadway, have difficulty saying "No.": "OK, you can have an ensemble of 16;" "OK, you can have an orchestra of 24;" "OK, you can have three turntables." Their non-Equity-producing brethren, who are used to operating with thinner profit margins, have no problem saying "No.": "No, you can only have 8 in the ensemble:" "No, you can only have 16 in the orchestra;" "No, the set has to fit into four trucks."

The road is different than it was. We need to talk and work with not only our traditional bargaining partners, but also traditionally non-Equity producers and our sister unions to help configure a road that works for all of us.

My best friend (who is ten inches shorter and 80 pounds lighter than I) has a running gag about how he the proto-mammal is going to steal the eggs of me the lumbering dinosaur and I am going to go extinct. That may be the situation on the road. Whether or not the CashCowasaurus goes extinct, it no longer rules the earth. We need to be alert, fast-moving, and adaptable in order to not only survive but thrive. Thanks to a flexible, determined and creative leadership and staff, Actors’ Equity Association is doing just that. 

President Nick Wyman
photo credit:

Contact President Nick Wyman at
read the original post on the AEA site here.


Christopher GurrComment